site stats

Dda v skipper construction case summary

Webindiankanoon.org WebDec 17, 1999 · Skipper filed Suit No. 770 of 1993 against DDA seeking injunction restraining DDA from interfering with its alleged title and possession over the plot and …

Delhi Development Authority v/s Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd.

WebCASE NO.: Special Leave Petition (civil) 21000 of 1993 PETITIONER: Delhi Development Authority RESPONDENT: Skipper Construction Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13/11/2002 BENCH: Umesh C. Banerjee & Shivaraj V. Patil. JUDGMENT: JUDGMENT Banerjee, J. M/s Skipper Constructions (P) Ltd. was incorporated on 14th … WebMay 6, 1996 · Skipper Properties is said to be running in a loss. He stated that he has no connection with the other companies pointed out by the DDA. He admitted the … cotton company asheville nc https://michaeljtwigg.com

Doctrine of Public Accountability in Administrative Law

WebNov 22, 2004 · Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Skipper)was the highest bidder, its bid being Rs. 9.82 crores. As per the conditions of the auction, … WebMar 20, 1997 · Court: Supreme Court Of India. Date: May 2, 2002. Cited By: 311. Coram: 3. .... 1996 4 SCC 622 and Dinesh Trivedi, M.P v. Union of India 1997 4 SCC 306 guidelines were laid...Kanhiya Lal Omar v. R.K Trivedi 1985 4 SCC 628 dealt with the constitutional validity of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 which was … Webability in Salomon, there have been numerous subsequent cases 19 where the courts were forced to look behind the corporate façade and hold the ones controlling the entity responsible for the debts and liabilities of the corporation itself. The deci-sions in such cases outlined different instances where piercing the veil was war- breath of the wild legendary horse

Presidency University School of Law: Dda V. Skipper Construction …

Category:Presidency University School of Law: Dda V. Skipper Construction …

Tags:Dda v skipper construction case summary

Dda v skipper construction case summary

Doctrine of Public Accountability — Ylcube

WebDec 17, 1999 · 12. The judgment of this Court in DDA v. Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd., 1996(4) SCC 622 shows that DDa filed a list of properties held by Tejwant Singh, his wife, Surinder Kaur and their sons and daughters which properties, according to them, belonged to these persons. WebGet free access to the complete judgment in Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper Construction And Another on CaseMine. Get free access to the complete judgment in Delhi Development Authority v. ... The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be ...

Dda v skipper construction case summary

Did you know?

WebDec 17, 1999 · DDA says that issue has become final by judgment dated 6.5.96 and cannot be reopened. On the other hand, it has come to light that the purchasers were not eo … WebAnsal Properties and M/s. Skipper Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. who were similarly situated as the plaintiff, were allowed to avail the said offer in terms of the recommendations of resolution no. 121 dated 14-05-1984 (Ex.DW2.P-4), the plaintiff for some reason was not permitted to avail the said offer. Further the plaintiff states that due to the ...

WebFeb 8, 1995 · On 21-12-1990, a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissed CWP No. 2371 of 1989 directing Skipper to pay to the DDA by cash or demand draft a sum of Rs … WebSep 6, 2024 · Facts of the Case. Skipper Construction had got possession from Delhi Development Authority (DDA) of flats but the consideration was only paid partly. It had collected huge sums of money from the prospective purchasers of the flats. This was challenged. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against five officers.

WebFeb 23, 2001 · (11) In view of the judgment of this Court in Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd., 2000 (10) SCC 130 no further order need be passed excepting that the calculation of interest on actuals would be effected at the time of final disposal of the matter. I. WebJul 5, 2024 · Article 142 gives the SC power to make such orders which may be necessary for doing “complete justice” in a case. This power has been deliberately left undefined and elastic enough to grant suitable reliefs in a given situation [Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper Construction Company].

WebJan 25, 1995 · Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'Skipper') was the highest bidder, its bid being Rs. 9.82 crores. As per the conditions of the auction, …

WebDec 15, 2024 · Attorney General of India v. Amritlal Prajivandas. The validity of the SAFEMA Act was challenged in this case because it mandated for the properties to be released which were received as a result of smuggling or any other malafide activity. 2. DDA v. Skipper Construction Corporation breath of the wild last memoryWebFeb 8, 1995 · Skipper Construction & Anr [1995] INSC 124 (8 February 1995) Sawant, P.B. Sawant, P.B. Mohan, S. (J) Jeevan Reddy, B.P. (J) 1. The facts leading to contempt proceedings are as under: On 8.10.1980, an auction was held by the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as the DDA ) of the 394 Commercial Tower Plot, … breath of the wild last memory locationWebSkipper Construction Company [Skipper] offered the highest bid in A sum of Rs. 9.82 crores. It was supposed to be a record bid at that time. According to the conditions of auction, … cottonconnect log in