Peevyhouse v. garland coal & mining co

Author: jqgh

August undefined, 2024

WebPeevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Company is illustrative of Oklahoma's policy toward land reclamation following surface mining prior to the coal surface damage acts. 2 In Peevyhouse, the plaintiffs, a farm couple, entered into negotiations with the defendant coal mining company to lease their farm, which contained coal deposits. WebRule: Where, in a coal mining lease, lessee agrees to perform certain remedial work on the premises concerned at the end of the lease period, and thereafter the contract is fully …

Contracts Law Outline - 1 - Specific Performance, Efficiency

WebIn 1954 Willie and Lucille Peevyhouse leased land to Garland Coal Co. for a five year strip mining operation. The contract stated that Garland would restore the land to its original character after five years. When the time came Garland refused, saying the the value of the restoration was only $300 while the cost was $25,000. Willie and Lucille ... WebI. Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co. a. Plaintiffs owned a farm containing coal deposits and leased the premises to defendant for a period of 5 years for coal mining purposes. The defendant specifically agreed to perform certain restorative and remedial work at the end of the lease period. It would roughly cost $29,000 to complete ... how big was the uss grayback

Expectation Damages - Assignment 34 - Studocu

WebPeevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co. (Okl. 1963) Facts: s owned farm land containing coal deposits and entered into a five-year strip-mining lease with . Under the lease, which called for a state royalty per ton mined, agreed to restore the land by filling in the pits when the work was done. refused to do the land restoration work of which ... WebSky Petroleum v VIP Petroleum [1974] 1 WLR 576 is an English contract law case, concerning the possibility of claiming specific performance of a promise after breach of contract. Facts. VIP Petroleum had agreed to sell Sky Petroleum all their petrol and diesel needs at fixed prices and in a minimum annual quantity. WebGarland Coal and Mining Co. Plaintiff contracted with defendant coal mining company to allow them to use plaintiff’s land in excavating a coal vein. In the contract, defendant specifically agreed to perform certain restorative and remedial work at the end of the contract. The work would involve moving many thousands of yards of dirt, a cost ... how big was the upper room

356 F. 2d 979 - Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Company

Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal Mining Company - casetext.com

WebAug 7, 2024 · Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109 a contract law case that was decided by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. This court case has been given the name “The Ballad of Willie and Lucille” to illustrate the collective tale of their passage in and out of the courts to have justice prevail. WebIn the Peeveyhouse case, the Peeveyhouses signed a contract allowing the defendant, Garlan Coal and Mining Company to stripmine a portion of their property in exchange for … how big was the ussr in kmWebPeevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109 (Oklahoma 1962) was a landmark judgment in environmental law and good practice. Landowner Peevyhouse filed a lawsuit … how big was the universe after 3 minutes

"WebPeevyhouse v. Garland Coal and Mining Co. - brief Facts of the case: plaintiffs owned a farm containing coal deposits, and in November, 1954, leased the premises to defendant for a … " - Peevyhouse v. garland coal & mining co

Peevyhouse v. garland coal & mining co

WebPeevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109 (Okla. 1962): 69-73. 10:45 – 11:00 am Break . 11:00 am – 12:15 pm Class 3: Market Dynamics John M. Yun, Associate Professor of Law and Deputy Executive Director, Global Antitrust Institute, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School

Did you know?

WebPeevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co. 5. The plaintiffs, a Native American family, signed a strip-mining lease only after foregoing a $3,000 payment in exchange for the agreement by the Coal Company to restore their land after the end of the lease. The Coal Company breached the agreement, leaving an unusable and unsightly tract Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109 (Okla. 1962), is a US contract law case decided by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. It concerns the question of when specific performance of a contractual obligation will be granted and the measure of expectation damages.

WebPeevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co., 382 P.2d 109 , is a US contract law case decided by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. It concerns the question of when specific … WebPeevyhouse v. Garland Coal and Mining Co. Digging Out the Facts: • Plaintiffs leased a farm to Coal Company for coal mining operations. Agreement that grading would be completed at end of lease, requiring the movement of many thousands of cubic yards of dirt. • Defendant breached by not completing grading as promised.

WebExpert Answer. 3. Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Company 382 P.2d 109 (Okla. 1962), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 906 recover are limited to the diminution in value resulting to the premises because of the non- performance. JACKSON, J. In the trial court, plaintiffs Willie and Lucille Peevyhouse sued the defendant, Garland Coal and Mining Company ... WebPeevyhouse v. Garland Coal and Mining Co. SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA. 382 P 2d 109 (1962) OPINION: JACKSON, Justice. In the trial court, plaintiffs Willie and Lucille Peevyhouse sued the defendant, Garland Coal and Mining Company, for damages for breach of contract. Judgment was for plaintiffs in an amount considerably less than was …

WebDisposition Judgment reversed. Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co Facts: Garland Coal (D) contracted for the right to strip mine coal on Peevyhouse’s (P) property for five years. The contract provided that Garland would perform restoration work on the property at the end of the lease period. Peevyhouse sued for $25,000 when Garland refused to …

WebPeevyhouse v. Garland Coal and Mining Co. Plaintiff contracted with defendant coal mining company to allow them to use plaintiff’s land in excavating a coal vein. In the contract, … how big was the tunguska meteorWebPeevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co. 382 P.2d 109, cert. denied, 375 U.S. 906 (Okla. 1963) Jackson, J. In the trial court, plaintiffs Willie and Lucille Peevyhouse sued the defendant, Garland Coal Mining Company, for damages for breach of contract. Judgment was for plaintiffs in an amount considerably less than was sued for. Plaintiffs how big was the uss indianapolisWebDec 6, 2024 · The Peevyhouse brought suit seeking damages of $25,000. The lower court ruled in favor of the Peevyhouse and instructed the jury to award damages based on the … how big was the uss maineWebPeevyhouse v. Garland Coal and Mining Co. OPINION: JACKSON, Justice. In the trial court, plaintiffs Willie and Lucille Peevyhouse sued the defendant, Garland Coal and Mining … how big was the uss arizonaWebWill there be a similar negotiation if the coal company is ordered to compensate the Peevyhouses only for the diminution in the market value of their farm? At the conclusion … how big was the universe at the big bangWebNov 28, 2007 · The Peevyhouse Farm: By Todd Zywicki on November 28, 2007 9:01 pm. A classic Contracts law case is that of Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal. I was recently reading Judith Maute’s article, The Unearthed Facts of Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co. from the Contracts Stories books. Maute provides a url for the Google Earth picture of the ... how big was the wall nehemiah builtWebIn November 1954, the Peevyhouses leased their farm to Garland Coal Mining Co. (Garland) (defendant) for coal mining purposes for five years. … how big was the uss iowa